Job Satisfaction
The Best Efficiency Measure

People who are happy at work take fewer sick days. That's the whole secret.

Norway spends over 215 billion kroner per year on sick leave and disability benefits. More than the entire defence budget. We could significantly reduce that amount — without cutting services or pressuring people harder.

Instead, we should do the opposite: invest in good leadership, better workplace culture, and people who thrive at work. It costs less than what we currently spend, and it's the only thing that truly works.

The Problem — The Cost of Sick Leave

Sick leave every year

74.9 bn

paid out

Disability benefits every year

140.7 bn

paid out

Combined total

Over 215 billion kr

— more than the entire defence budget

One percent improvement saves 7.5 billion

If we simply reduced sick leave in the public sector by one percentage point — from 6.9% to 5.9% — we would save 7.5 billion kroner per year. This is not magic. It's entirely achievable.

The public sector has higher rates than private industry

Sick leave rates are higher in the public and municipal sectors than in private business. This isn't because public employees are weaker or less motivated. It's because workplaces are poorly organized.

People burn out, not because they're weak

When an employee takes leave or goes on sick leave, it's because the job — or the management — is unsustainable. Not because they lack motivation. The workplace is what needs to change.

What Efficiency Does NOT Mean

  • Not running faster

    When we talk about efficiency, we don't mean pressuring staff harder or increasing workload.

  • Not doing more with fewer people

    A department with a low budget that must accomplish the same with half the staff ends up with high sick leave and poor results.

  • Not cutting and hoping

    Budget cuts without investment in solutions only create stress and frustration — and higher sick leave.

  • Not judging by numbers alone

    A department with low costs and 15% sick leave is NOT efficient — it's poorly managed. Efficiency must always include sick leave in the calculation.

What Efficiency Really Means

Efficiency means people should thrive at work — and as a consequence, organizations and businesses will function better.

Better workplace culture

People are satisfied, social bonds are strong, tasks are manageable

Lower sick leave

People take fewer sick days because they feel good and aren't exhausted

Lower costs

Fewer benefits paid, higher productivity, better quality

The only thing that really works is good leadership. A skilled manager who understands people, organizes work sensibly, and builds trust — that's the fastest path to better workplace culture.

Leadership and technical roles should not be mixed

Being the best at your trade doesn't mean you're good at leading people. These are two completely different skillsets:

Both roles should have equal status and respect. One shouldn't be seen as more prestigious than the other. And people should choose their career path based on what they're good at — not because leadership is the automatic next step for talented professionals.

The Big Commitment — Public Sector Leaders

Our first and most important investment is a massive push to develop leaders in the public sector. It's the cheapest investment, it gives the fastest returns, and it's Phase 1 of our implementation plan.

Mission-based leadership

We want to learn from the military: give people the goal and the framework, but trust them to find the way. This kind of leadership removes unnecessary barriers and gives people the freedom to do their jobs right.

Learning culture

After every project or period, the whole team talks openly about what worked and what didn't — regardless of position. This makes organizations learn and improve faster.

Measuring what matters

Leaders should be evaluated on workplace culture and satisfaction, not just budget and output. Poor workplace culture means poor results anyway — and higher costs through sick leave.

Skills in human management

Leaders need training in workplace psychology, conflict resolution, and motivation. You don't learn this just by being good at your trade.

We invest in this from day one — and it pays off quickly.

Understanding Life Stages

A 25-year-old and a 58-year-old are not the same — and that's a strength, not a problem. They have different abilities, energy levels, and strengths at different life stages.

Young people (20–40)

Strength: Intensity, pace, energy, eagerness to learn

Best suited for: New challenges, innovation, experimentation

Experienced workers (50–70)

Strength: Experience, perspective, judgment, stability

Best suited for: Mentoring, coaching, quality control, leadership

Reskilling: Society's second major investment

The first time society invests heavily in individuals is through education in their 20s. We want to create a second major investment — available from age 40 to 60: reskilling.

A structured 6–12 month program that gives you pedagogy, coaching, or leadership skills, on top of the experience you already have. The goal is to move people from roles their bodies or industries no longer support, to roles where their experience is invaluable.

Reskilling is financed as a life-stage support through the employment agency — same model as student finance: basic stipend plus progression bonus. The program costs about 200,000 kroner per person. The alternative — sick leave, early retirement, disability — costs millions.

Reskilling solves three problems at once: it gives senior workers a dignified and meaningful end to their careers, it solves the shortage of teachers and mentors with practical experience, and it reduces sick leave and early retirement.

The goal is for reskilling at 55 to become as natural as military service at 19.

Read more about reskilling in the party platform

Protect the Overworked

The most physically demanding jobs need relief. Not by cutting staff or pressuring them harder — but by removing what wears them out.

Technology to remove the burden

Major investment in robotics and automation of the most strenuous work — heavy lifting in healthcare and elder care, repetitive tasks in manufacturing, work that damages the body.

Job rotation and flexibility

People should be able to rotate between tasks that use their bodies differently, so no single part gets overworked.

Reduced hours for the most demanding work

People in the most physically demanding jobs should be able to work fewer hours than others — with wage subsidies from employers and society.

The principle: We should not have people being worn out by their work — but we recognize it exists today, and we'll support them while we work to eliminate the root causes.

The Red Thread

Take care of employees

Lower sick leave

Lower costs

Room for lower taxes

More freedom for people

Job satisfaction is not a goal in itself. It's not a luxury concept for idealists. It's the most effective and cheapest path to a rich and free society.

When people are happy at work, they thrive, take fewer sick days, and work better. Costs go down. And when costs go down, we can lower taxes and give people more freedom to build lives that matter to them.

See the full implementation plan — Phase 1 starts here

Want to learn more?

Job satisfaction is just one of many topics in our party platform. See our full policy on work life, health, technology, and more.

Read the full party platform